0004 per 1,000 requests for S3 GET requests invoked by Lambda functions. S3 vs EBS vs EFS. per GB. When using the Amazon S3 plugin, we still make use of EFS but most of the traffic throughput will be shifted to Amazon S3. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server provides simple, fully managed, highly reliable file storage that’s accessible. One allows you to run servers in the cloud with minimal effort on your part, while the other is designed for storing large amounts of static data and ideal for data backups. But even within a single AZ, completely eliminating data replication costs, the total cost of ownership was $6,377 on. It’s easy to get confused with. $0. 8. Follow. Conclusion. 023 per GB, making it fairly cheap compared to EBS and EFS. S3/EBS/EFS and Azure Storage. cost: $0. The Takeaways. SG still requires the other storage systems. There are several interesting aspects in terms of pricing. 1. 2k savings per month. Amazon S3 is a cloud storage service that can be accessed from anywhere. Key differences: EBS: Block Storage. Specifically in the storage arena, AWS provides three popular services — S3, Elastic Block Store (EBS), and Elastic File System (EFS). EFS, EBS, and S3 are AWS’ three different storage types that are applicable for different types of workload needs. EBS vs EFS – Pricing. 6. All of these can already be centrally controlled. More than 700,000 data lakes run on AWS. Continuous replication of data has the advantage of being the shortest. Also, you only pay for what you use! SFTP, on the other hand, is not scalable independently, but rather utilizes the disk space made available to it by the given operating system on the server. S3 Intelligent-Tiering for automatic cost savings for data with unknown or changing access patterns. This is very easy to setup and has a great performance. 8. To enable that, navigate to the setup page of your external storage and open the advanced menu (three dots) and select “Enable Sharing. However, interesting difference is between EFS and S3, and to identify proper use cases for it. Adding the charges above, your total monthly bill for the AWS Transfer Family would be: $216 + $1. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparison Table. AWS DataSync is an online data transfer service that can copy data between Network File System (NFS), Server Message Block (SMB) file servers, self-managed object storage, and also between AWS services. As mentioned earlier, EC2 instances retain dataonly while they are running. Active Aug 14 '22 at 05:01. Use AWS DataSync to migrate existing data to Amazon S3, and then use the File Gateway configuration of AWS Storage Gateway to retain access to the migrated data and. EFS vs EBS Multi-Attach features. Amazon Glacier and Amazon S3 are primarily classified as "Data Backup" and "Cloud Storage" tools respectively. 3. Pros and Cons. Anything over 500 TB is charged at $0. 0025 per 1,000 objects stored. The AWS Elastic File System (EFS) is one of Amazon’s three primary storage solutions. Cost to use DataSync for each incremental copy of 10 TB of 16 MB files into S3 in the US East (Ohio) Region, assuming 500 LIST requests and one HEAD request per object in S3: (10 TB copied into S3 using DataSync * 1024 GB * $0. If same amount of data is kept in EBS (General Purpose SSD. 0004 for read requests. Share. 0 and 4. 1/Month (depends on speed - SSD or not) + IOPS costs; EFS: $0. For performance, Amazon EBS is the fastest due to high IOPS, but when it comes to shared. EFS is generally best for traditional file-based applications, while S3 is best for cloud-native applications. 3. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 5 reviews while Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 31 reviews. I don't see how this could be write, because the pricing for EFS is always very high. The EFS Standard storage class is currently charged at $0. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8. Explore the AWS storage options: Elastic Block Storage (EBS), Elastic File System (EFS), and Simple Storage Service (S3). 025$ per GB a month for standard storage and 0. Describes a policy used by EFS lifecycle management and EFS Intelligent-Tiering that specifies when to transition files into and out of the file system's Infrequent Access (IA) storage class. Total cost of ownership may be higher, depending on your needs for the data being stored. In the navigation pane, choose Tasks. The model is stored either in S3, ECR (via OCI deployment with Lambda), or EFS and is then used by a compute service such as Lambda. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System): A fully managed, elastic, and scalable Network File System (NFS) that supports the NFSv4 protocol. EBS allows you to store files directly on an EC2 instance, allowing the instance to access your files in a quick and cheap manner. The usage conditions for the Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering storage class are updated. Amazon EFS. In the first scenario, involving 1TB of total storage replicated across two AZs, the total cost of ownership was $3,686 under AWS EFS pricing, and $9,457 using a self-managed solution. S3 Standard IA. Overall, S3 is best suited for storing large amounts of unstructured data, EBS is best for use with EC2 instances as storage, and EFS is best for file storage and sharing among multiple EC2 instances or ECS containers. 0133$ per GB a month for one-zone storage. Where they differ is that instead of storing data in a minimum of three AZs, S3 One Zone-IA stores data in a single AZ and costs 20% less. Single part upload: This is the standard way to upload the files to s3. It allows users to store and retrieve files. S3 is also much better for public files like images, videos, HTML/CSS files, and other web resources that are. Unlike EBS or EFS, S3 is not limited to EC2. There are also native storage options available, such as temporary storage or Lambda layers. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 Glacier: which is better? Base your decision on 12 verified in-depth peer reviews and ratings, pros & cons, pricing, support and more. Storage cost is based on the average storage used through the month. $0. . How does Amazon S3 compare to Amazon EBS vs. Amazon S3 Report Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Read 5 Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) reviews. However, there are various other pricing parameters in S3, including cost per number of requests made, S3 Analytics, and data transfer out of S3 per gigabyte. 999999999% (11 9s) of data durability and 99. EFS and S3 are designed to scale automatically. Optimizing EFS costs: Amazon keeps making it. EFS Systems. Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Agile. Entire data is stored in fixed-size blocks that have unique addresses. Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) vs. With a few clicks in the Amazon Management Console, you can create file systems that are accessible to Amazon EC2 instances via a file system interface (using standard operating system file I/O APIs) and support full. EFS blows way past S3 just in storage costs. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 5 reviews while Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 6th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 11 reviews. 30. S3 will likely provide the most durability for you, as well as being one of the cheapest solutions when only factoring in cost of storage. Given the hidden compute and support costs, security integration, and performance issues, S3 as a data platform for RDBMS-sourced, frequently-refreshed data is a far cry from its $23/TB/month promise. Amazon S3: Amazon EBS: Amazon EFS: Storage Cost (US-East, for example) Amazon S3 pricing:. It allows users to store and retrieve files. Các tệp được lưu trữ trong S3 bucket có. 04 * 1 GB/day * 30 days = $1. com Serverless File System | Amazon Elastic File System Pricing | AWS Products Storage Amazon EFS Amazon EFS Pricing Get started for free Request a pricing quote Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is designed to provide serverless, fully elastic file storage that helps you share file data without provisioning or managing storage capacity and performance. 6, while Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8. 04 USD per provisioned MiB/s-month over 125. Use Case: AWS S3 vs. EFS provides good performance for the following use cases: Big data and analytics —EFS can provide high throughput to compute nodes, read-after-write consistency and low-latency file operations. However, for external storage, sharing files and folders is deactivated by default. Understanding the Differences. If you need one networked drive attached to the file system of several EC2 instance / containers simultaneously then go with EFS. (per GB storage) for Amazon S3 vs Amazon EFS? Thanks for the help! Jitendra Patel. 1/GB-month of GP2) for smaller storage volumes. Used when a lot of information has to be stored at the lowest price. Prices are plus network usage. For Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), you can use Amazon S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR) to asynchronously copy objects to an S3 bucket in the DR region continuously, while providing versioning for the stored objects so that you can choose your restoration point. It barely beats a single io2 Block Express EBS volume (5GB/sec EFS vs. Amazon Glacier with Expedited retrievals B. Think multiple EC2 instances and lots of data. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparison Table. The Takeaways. The Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (EFS Standard-IA) and Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access (EFS One Zone-IA) storage classes are cost-optimized for files accessed less frequently. 9. Can be accessed concurrently by multiple Amazon EC2 instances, allowing them to share data. 1/Month (depends on speed – SSD or not) + IOPS costs; EFS: $0. EBS has a lower price per GB-month compared to EFS—$0. Amazon S3? AWS offers cloud storage services to support a wide range of storage workloads. 3/Month. 20 per 1 million Lambda requests*. The cost of using the AWS EFS Infrequent Access tier storage is drastically lower—$0. When it was launched in February the EFS IA storage class was priced at $0. 6 ms. EBS and EFS both outperform Amazon S3 in terms of. AWS Data Storage Service Offerings. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8. 30 per GB per month. When you create an EFS file system using EFS Quick Create, the file system is created with the following. Part 2: [this blog post] A deep dive on how EFS security works in container deployments based on ECS and Fargate with some high-level considerations around regional ECS and EFS deployments best practices. 6. S3/EBS/EFS and Azure Storage. 1 What is Amazon S3 1. January 29. EBS and EFS both outperform Amazon S3 in terms of. 021-0. 0125 per GB-month for the EBS Snapshots Archive storage, you are charged $2. But it’s worth considering the cost of EFS (GB/month, no bandwidth and request charges) vs S3 (bandwidth, request and GB/month) for your specific workload. This means that even if you attach a dozen instances to it, you will pay the same price as if you simply attached one. There are no additional AWS Transfer Family charges for using Amazon EFS as the storage backend, but storing data on Amazon EFS is significantly more expensive than on Amazon S3. how to optimize performance, see a brief comparison of EFS vs EBS vs S3, and discover how Cloud Volumes ONTAP can help. Create file system. answered Mar 25, 2019 at 19:17. At present the price for AWS Transfer Family for SFTP, FTPS, and FTP is the same for all protocols: Feature. But even within a single AZ, completely eliminating data replication costs, the total cost of ownership was $6,377. The number of GET requests to S3 will increase so your S3 cost will increase as well. In this article, we will discuss these storage solutions in detail along with their differences. After caching is enabled, there is a 5x improvement when serving static assets stored on Amazon EFS. Total monthly restore charge = 10 GB x $0. Ofcourse there would be read/write latency compared to EBS as EBS is designed for low-latency access to data. The cost of FSx storage decreases with deduplication. You’ll also want to consider compression schemes. For example, when using the U. AWS offers the same durability as S3 along with data querying options; Google cold. 20 = $217. 2 Use cases 3 Amazon EFS 3. In the first scenario, involving 1TB of total storage replicated across two AZs, the total cost of ownership was $3,686 under AWS EFS pricing, and $9,457 using a self-managed solution. This will reduce the cost of your storage by up to 92 percent compared to EFS Standard and EFS One Zone storage classes respectively. EFS Standard tier storage costs $0. When you copy objects containing file system metadata back to file formats, the original file metadata (that DataSync copied to S3) is restored. You can use AWS Transfer Family and AWS DataSync to transfer data into and out of your Amazon EFS file systems. EFS Standard tier storage costs $0. 5GB, the time to fetch the video from s3 to node is very high. Create a bucket policy that limits access to only the application tier running in the VPC. You can mount an Amazon EFS file system in your virtual private cloud (VPC), through the Network. EFS is much much more expensive than S3 for the purpose of just saving into it and read from it. While EFS is more expensive than EBS ($0. Amazon EFS in Max I/O mode. At present the price for AWS Transfer Family for SFTP, FTPS, and FTP is the same for all protocols: Time protocol is enabled on your endpoint. 30 hourly rate, your monthly charge for SFTP is: $0. 5. Amazon AWS has termed it as S3 storage while Microsoft Azure storage calls its offering as blob storage. 045-0. To improve the throughput without paying an additional cost. EBS: high performance, per-instance block storage EBS used to be accessible to a single EC2 instance only, making it most like your physical hard drive. S3 is suitable for a write-once, read-multiple-time approach, as it can be configured for access from anywhere. That represented a 61% saving by using EFS. In relationship to our use case, BOS will use this method to replicate all 900 Petabytes of data into a more cost effective S3 storage class such as glacier deep archive. A cost-performance comparison of AWS EBS volume types: magnetic EBS volume, general purpose SSD EBS volume and provisioned IOPS (PIOPS) EBS volume. The top reviewer of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) writes "A solution with good technical support that needs to improve its stability". Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) can host static websites without a need for a web server. More detail about. Cost of Using AWS S3. EFS: It allows us to mount the FS across multiple regions and instances (accessible from multiple EC2 instances). 2, while Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 7. AWS SFTP pricing can be broken down as such: Endpoint fee: $0. To summarize EBS volumes are for host storage, S3 volumes are for overall storage, and EFS is used when you need network storage for computing systems. These include other AWS services such as Amazon S3 and Amazon EFS. 01 per GB for HDD storage to £0. 023 per GB-month (in the US. 04. 0133$ per GB a month for one-zone storage. Elastic Block Storage (EBS). EBS snapshots have a flat storage cost of $0. $0. In the AWS platform, cloud storage is primarily broken down into three services: Simple Storage Service (S3). S3 is great for static files where EBS/EFS are more intended for files that. Seamlessly migrate, automate, and monitor your file transfer workflows into and out of Amazon S3 and Amazon EFS using the SFTP, FTPS, and FTP protocols. The model is stored either in S3, ECR (via OCI deployment with Lambda), or EFS and is then used by a compute service such as Lambda. 08/GB-month vs $0. Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS. S3 is a storage facility accessible any where. Amazon EC2 and Amazon S3 are fundamentally different types of services. 6, while Amazon S3 is rated 8. You'll have to pay lucid link plus all your S3 costs, so it won't save you money, but it performs very well. Improvement: 5X. 30 per GB per month (for the first TB). S. Scalability: Amazon S3 and EFS are highly scalable while EBS is hardly scalable. EFS vs. S3 is object storage. 6, while Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 7. 30/GB vs S3’s $0. Amazon S3 . Some AWS services only support using EFS (AWS Lambda, Linux ECS containers). With Amazon EFS, you can create a file system, mount the file system on an Amazon EC2 instance, and then read and write data to and from your file system. offers pay for the. 5. Amazon EFS file systems are distributed across an unconstrained number of storage servers, enabling file systems to grow elastically and allowing massively parallel access from EC2 instances. Amazon Glacier. With Amazon S3 as a data source, you can choose between File mode, FastFile mode, and Pipe mode: File mode – SageMaker copies a. accessed, throughput-intensive workloads: Big Data & Data warehouses: st1: 500GB - 16TB. Amazon charges separately for storage by GB, and separately for the number of objects stored in S3, to compensate for the cost of processing the data to identify the optimal tier for each one. There are multiple storage classes available in Amazon S3. 025 per GB per month. 2. Amazon S3? AWS offers cloud storage services to support a wide range of storage. The Google Cloud Platform (GCP) is one of the three major public clouds. 2/MonthS3 Glacier Deep Archive is a cost-effective and easy-to-manage alternative to tape. Lambda provides a comprehensive range of storage options to meet the needs of web application developers. Under Configuration, for Location type, select Amazon EFS file system. Time protocol is enabled on your endpoint. 01 per GB transferred). 2. † Backups of EFS, S3, VMware, SAP HANA on EC2 and Amazon Timestream are billed on a GB-day basis instead of a GB-hour basis. Lets’ learn about the differences of Amazon EBS. It depends on your specific use-cases and softwares but here's some basic guideline. 30 * 24 hours * 30 days = $216. S3 is for object storage. EBS stands for Elastic Block Store and is a block-level storage option for use with […] Even worse, if you aren't using the s3fs use_cache option, the latency on your requests goes up dramatically, slowing your site down, as it fetches from S3 during each request. Low cost HDD for freq. Unlike EBS or EFS, S3 is not. The full form of Amazon EBS is Amazon Elastic Block Store. With Amazon EFS, there are no minimum fee or setup costs, and you pay only for the storage you use. Simple Storage Service – S3. NFSv4. Data downloads. Backup storage is $0. Due to this, S3 can be used for building data lakes. 64. 023 depending on data size: Additional I/O Operations Per Second (IOPS) for extra $0. 05/GB-month = $102/month. S3 Glacier Deep. That represented a 61% saving by using EFS. One last note, these settings may be enough for many WordPress installations but in some cases, you have to optimize further. Cloud File System - AWS EFS. That same amount of S3 storage would cost $47. 4 GB/s which is 22X faster than EFS. Correct Answer: B. EBS is for EC2 block storage. ¥ 0. This includes integrations with Amazon S3, Amazon RDS, and Amazon VPC, along with Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling. EFS would $60/month for 200GB to store the data, but $4. 999999999%). AWS EFS is an elastic and shared file storage system. AWS Backup is a service that helps you centrally manage backups across multiple Amazon storage services, including EFS, DynamoDB, RDS, and AWS snapshots performed via EBS. Mount your EFS file system if it is not already mounted on the EC2 instance. That is my personal feeling to the circumstance = EFS is the best solution that is the easiest to maintain. and cost. EFS offers two performance modes – general purpose and MaxIO. Amazon S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access: Like S3 Standard-IA, S3 One Zone-IA is for data that’s accessed less frequently, but requires rapid access when needed. Updated: September 2023. $0. The top reviewer of Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) writes "A tool to deal with not only servers having low space but also the migration of servers". EFS offers high performance up to 10 GB/sec and 500,000 IOPS. From your hard drive in the. EBS is block, EFS is file, S3 is object. Over 500 TB / month. The full form of Amazon EBS is Amazon Elastic Block Store. You can also use a shared EFS file system to share other types of data, such as configuration files or even the state of circuit breakers. Enter the amount of EFS storage capacity you expect to use. 20/MBps-month = $18/month. Amazon S3 looks the cheapest but that might not always be the case. Lustre also has deep integrations with Amazon S3. 0000167 per GB-second for the duration the Lambda function runs*. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the differences between the three and how to choose the right service for your use-case. For example, some plugins can be configured to write logs. The usage conditions for the Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering storage class are updated. 999999999% (11 9’s) of durability. It is mainly used for data that should be quickly accessible and requires long term durability. For example, a provisioned EBS volume of 500 GB with 1,000 IOPs would cost $162. Time protocol is enabled on your endpoint. 3 per GB a month. In a physical environment this volume might be coming from storage or a server. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8. 0125 per GB-month * 200 GB). C. For example, if you list the objects in an S3 bucket, the console shows the storage class for all the objects in the list. 01 per 1,000 PUT requests; Data transfer: $0. 025 per GB-month. EFS, and explore the differences in the storage types across management, cost, performance and uses. To do this when creating a file system using the console, choose Availability and Durability, and then choose One Zone. Cost-effective. The table below contains a few examples of the price per 1 ms associated with different memory sizes, for usage falling within the first pricing tier – for. FSx for Lustre has a native file system interface and functions with the Linux operating system. You could have 5-10 copies of something before s3 cost more than EFS. 4GB/sec io2 BE), and the io2 Block Express volume can do it with a single client. How is the answer - "Cost of test file storage on S3 Standard < Cost of test file storage on EFS < Cost of test file storage on EBS". Don't expect the moon, benchmark and monitor it, and you'll do fine. In this Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS, we will discuss the differences between Amazon S3, EBS, and EFS. 2; 40; Answer. EBS could make sense if you are hyper sensitive to speed (and can't achieve the speeds with S3+other components) and not cost or high availability. Storage Type: AWS S3 is object storage while Amazon EBS is block storage and Amazon EFS is file storage. 99% as Amazon S3 Standard Storage, it has a much lower durability of 99. S3's standard tier costs $0. It is mainly used for data that should be quickly accessible and requires long term durability. The EFS uses the NFS protocol and can scale up to petabytes. It allows for simultaneous file access from multiple EC2 instances, and there are no limits on the system size. Discover which one suits your storage needs best. It provides a simple interface to manage file systems and supports multiple EC2 instances. AWS EBS is only accessible in a single region, while multiple EFS instances can share files across multiple regions. S3/EBS/EFS and Azure Storage. There are products that solve this problem for you, such as S3, DynamoDB, Elasticache Redis or Memcached. NOTE : if you want to access your data on ebs or efs you would need to spin up an ec2 instance which also add cost. 053. ”. The differences in monthly charges for similar amounts of S3 and EBS with provisioned I/O storage can be substantial. The three key file storage services AWS provides are similar, but different. That said, increasing the costs over S3 by 10x the price for maybe 2-3 times the overall performance is a pretty tough sell. $0. It is used to provide the block-level storage volumes for the use of EC2 instances. In single model architecture, you have a single ML inference model that performs the inference for all incoming requests. 0125 per GB-month for the EBS Snapshots Archive storage, you are charged $2. Offers cost-saving storage classes ideal for infrequently access data or for data archival; provides unlimited storage There are two types of ML inferencing architectures, single model and multi-model. offers pay for the storage you actually use. Reaching that 5GB/sec with EFS costs $30,000/month for either 100TB of data or 5GB/sec in provisioned bandwidth. To manage the process of creating the destination file system and keeping it synced with the source file system, Amazon EFS uses a replication. Networked file systems have inherent tradeoffs over local filesystem access—EFS doesn't change that. Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP, OpenZFS, Windows File Server, and Lustre. 3. You can preserve the EC2…Amazon EC2 also has a variety of features that allows it to function better in conjunction with other AWS services. Amazon EFS is a regional service that delivers single-digit millisecond latency while storing data across at least three Availability Zones and is designed for 99. Now, Amazon EFS offers two different storage classes to you, which each offer different levels of performance and cost, these being Standard and Infrequent Access, known as IA. Amazon EBS is a block-level storage service. EBS and EFS both outperform Amazon S3 in terms of IOPS and latency. 10 per GB for EBS), you have to pay once for each EFS file system. AWS Glue then allows seamless data movement between data lakes. 021 USD. Cost of 1 TB storage with 50MBps throughput in EFS. 6, while Amazon S3 is rated 8. LifecyclePolicy. • Baseline performance of 3 IOPS per GB for. EBS: $0. Block level storage intended for access by a single VM. EC2 Auto Scaling automatically increases or decreases the number of required EC2 instances depending. 60/month in S3. However you must keep in mind that GP2’s performance is proportional to its volume capacity, so to have higher performance, you must provision a volume with higher storage capacity. You can delete old copies from s3 and the cost difference between s3 and EFS is massive. A. It’s a highly reliable and secure storage solution and a great option for creating large backups for data recovery. 1 for SSD storage. In some scenarios, EFS will be more. With AWS Lake Formation, you can build secure data lakes in days instead of months. Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) Score 8. However, interesting difference is between EFS and S3, and to identify proper use cases for it. Another low-redundancy option of this storage class is Amazon S3 Reduced Redundancy Storage, or RRS. If you store more than 50 TB per month, the next 450 TB will be charged at $0. S3 is an object storage system, designed to provide archiving and data control options. Amazon S3. 04c/1000 requests. This tier costs $0. The system shrinks and grows when you remove or add files. Assuming a monthly model training cost of USD10k, this translates to USD6. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. AWS มีบริการพื้นที่จัดเก็บบนระบบคลาวด์ที่รองรับเวิร์ก. Assume you have an Amazon EFS file system in the China (Ningxia) Region, operated by NWCD with 1TB of data. 1 out of 10. Before we can get into the direct comparison of Amazon S3 vs. Yet despite these differences, Amazon EC2 and Amazon S3 complement each other in significant ways. Amazon S3 Standard Infrequent Access C. EFS is Elastic File Storage its a shared storage provided by AWS we can attach 1 EFS with multiple Ec2 instances. Use AWS S3 for scalable, cost-effective object storage, ideal for static assets and backups. It’s easy to get confused with. In this blog, we will discuss EFS, EBS, and S3, and on the. Amazon EFS is easy to use offering a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. S3 Intelligent-Tiering Storage, Frequent Access Tier. Regarding cost, Amazon S3 is no doubt the cheapest in terms of pure storage costs. Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is rated 8. g.